[KNS01a]
M. Kwiatkowska, G. Norman and R. Segala.
Automated Verification of a Randomised Distributed Consensus Protocol Using Cadence SMV and PRISM.
In G. Berry, H. Common and A. Finkel (editors), Proc. CAV'01, volume 2102 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 194-206, Springer.
January 2001.
[ps.gz]
[pdf]
[bib]
[Analyses Aspnes and Herlihy's randomised consensus protocol using PRISM and Cadence SMV.]
|
Notes:
Further information and verification results are available from the
PRISM web page.
The original publication is available at link.springer.com.
|
Links:
[Google]
[Google Scholar]
|
Abstract.
We consider the randomized consensus protocol of Aspnes
and Herlihy for achieving agreement among N
asynchronous processes that communicate via read/write shared
registers. The algorithm guarantees termination in the presence of
stopping failures within polynomial expected time. Processes
proceed through possibly unboundedly many rounds; at each
round, they read the status of all other processes and attempt to
agree. Each attempt involves a distributed random walk:
when processes
disagree, a shared coin-flipping protocol is used to decide their
next preferred value. Achieving polynomial expected time depends
on the probability that all
processes draw the same value being above an appropriate bound.
For the non-probabilistic part of the algorithm, we use the
proof assistant Cadence SMV to prove
validity and agreement for all N and for all
rounds. The coin-flipping protocol is verified
using the probabilistic model checker PRISM. For a
finite number of processes (up to 10) we automatically calculate the
minimum probability of the processes drawing the same value.
The correctness of the full protocol
follows from the
separately proved properties. This is the first time a complex
randomized distributed algorithm has been mechanically verified.
|